On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:09:08AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>>No, it's just a consequence of HZ=1000 instead of HZ=100. I've > >> > >> > >>so why 2000 not 1000? > >> > >>2000 on each processor! > > > >Technical reasons..anyway, 2000 might look like a large number to you, > >but it's really not unless you're on a very slow machine (like a 486). > > i'm asking why it's 2000, not 1000.
I don't remember off-hand. It should be apparent if you look at the code. Kris
pgpq8JzZmn4Mx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
