On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:51 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 2:02 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Indeed. But this is not Solaris 10 - thats when all of this
changed.
I never understood why anyone would go to Solaris 10 unless they
had a
64 bit processor and compiled all their apps under a 64 bit
compiler.
Sun
didn't either, which is why they originally didn't come out with a
Solaris x86
version of Solaris 10 They only came out with it after much
screaming.
I run it (Solaris 10) on a dual Athlon 2800+ MP box. As a server.
No X-Windows. To run java. And it runs java better than the same
box did with Linux and the sun jvm.
Is the Java version your running restricted to Solaris 10 and above?
I don't know.
Is Solaris 10 faster/stabler with Java than older Solaris versions?
I just got involved with Solaris after 10 was made "Free" (see the
yahoo Solarisx86 list for that discussion -- the same list where this
thread originally started I think before it forked) so I have no
baseline to compare against. I had been running a gentoo Linux 2.4.x
kernel for java processing (before the FreeBSD 1.4 jvm got as good as
it is now) and when the machine had problems, I put Solaris 10 on it
as a test since it has some good resource management stuff for RAM
and CPU etc that I wanted to use with my various java backend
customers and my simple tests showed the same java apps with better
performance than the same HW had with linux... ymmv
Best regards
Chad
Ted
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
