On Nov 17, 2005, at 6:01 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
In real world use my 256MB G4-400 MacOS X 10.4.3 Powerbook is faster
than my 512MB 2GHz WinXP Pro box at work.
But - Chad said that the G4 is a no-go? That the G5 was an absolute
requirement
for laptop use? Yet your saying that a G4 for a laptop is perfectly
acceptable?
Then why again ais Apple moving to Intel chips to get laptops? :-)
Current G4 chips work fine in laptops and allow people to get their
work done. Some people need more.
But G4s are not competitive with the Intel competition and into the
future would be even less competitive.
Long term Apple needed a new solution. They chose what they feel (and
probably is) the best solution.
Personally I would rather have had AMD but the current AMD laptop
solution (and laptops were Apple's biggest concerns IMHO) is not as
strong and Intel is seen as a stronger partner. It is all irrelevant
anyway as AMD and Intel are the same architecture anyway and so Apple
could easily move to AMD or to a mix without SW issues.
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
