On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 07:08:12PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote: > Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ? > > I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was "clear" ULE was > a better alternative for performance then 4BSD
Yes, in the workloads I have tested. Others have reported similar things. You should carefully measure it yourself on your workloads to verify which is better. Kris
pgp66BefrOC6Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
