On Saturday, 1 October 2005 at 4:11:25 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:58:14PM -0400, Ansar Mohammed wrote: >> I love FreeBSD. I have been using it since 2.x. I have never had any >> problems with it. Rock Solid. Never a single kernel panic. >> >> Then I come across this article in a comparison between Linux and >> FreeBSD saying that FreeBSD has kernel locking >> issues. Specifically, a problem nicknamed BGL or Big Giant Lock. It >> seems that it affects SMP systems under high load. > > Sounds like a pretty simplistic summary, but as I mentioned it's out > of date anyway.
I don't think that answers his question. I think that most people (with the exception of Erik Trulsson) have missed the fact that Ansar has a misconception about the meaning of "BGL". This is not a "problem", and it has nothing to do with kernel stability (lockups); it has to do with the way the kernel protects its data integrity in normal operation. All kernels perform locking for this purpose. Older UNIX (including BSD) and Linux systems used a thing called the "Big Kernel Lock" or Giant to ensure that only one process, system wide, had access to the entire kernel at a time. This was a performance issue, not a stability issue. All modern systems have relaxed this requirement. You may like to look at my (now somewhat out of date) papers on FreeBSD SMPNg, available at http://www.lemis.com/grog/Papers/. There should be more up-to-date information on the current state of the FreeBSD implementation. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
pgp3PP5EjyaZf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
