Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>scottl@ removed: >> <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small >> hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td> >> >>this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commits >>to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then? > > > It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not > the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago. > > Kris >
Somewhat off topic - what's the status of 6.0? The info on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/schedule.html Has not been updated in some time and we're still on Beta5 -- Best regards, Chris Things equal to nothing else are equal to each other. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
