On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:17:57PM -0700, whistles wrote: > On 7/21/05, markzero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:23:56PM -0400, ender wrote: > > > Stephen Major wrote: > > > > > > >You are correct; I made a mistake on that one. > > > >Sudo should not be forced upon anyone. > > > >I do not care if sudo is part of the base system > > > >I just 100% disagree with you wanting to replace su with sudo > > > > > > > >Look the other post that came from the dude before is 100% correct this > > > >is > > > >a > > > >dumb argument. > > > > > > > If sudo offered the opportunity for more features, but by default > > > behaved exactly the same way as su, I would see no disadvantages to > > > replacing su with sudo. Am i missing something? > > > > What happens if you maintain systems that don't need sudo? > > > > M > > > > You get an _uneeded_ setuid binary > > Do a few extra built in features for some outweigh everyone gettting > another setuid binary? > I say no myself > my 2cents >
That was the point that I was not-so-subtly making. :) M -- pgp: http://www.darklogik.org/pub/pgp/pgp.txt B776 43DC 8A5D EAF9 2126 9A67 A7DA 390F DEFF 9dD1
pgpwHcn2CHkcD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
