Grant wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:54:16 -0400
Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ... ]
The only reason i'm moving from apache is that apache has started (well
proberly did but i didnt notice) eating large amounts of ram, even when
idle, as i type this there is 4 apache processes using 29mb each, now
when there is a few people on my forum/site that goes up to around
12processes again all using 29mb which adds up to being quite a big
chunck of my ram. (384mb just for apache).
Sounds about right. If you run Apache without enabling PHP, you'll discover
that each httpd takes around 5MB per process, less than 20% of the size you are
seeing.
So i either want to get php working on a smaller httpd or maybe fix
apache.
You don't seem to understand the problem: it has nothing to do with apache.
If you try to get PHP working on a smaller httpd, you will end up with an httpd
(or the equivalent in external fast-cgi processes) that uses lots of resources,
because PHP itself uses lots of resources.
PHP and small/lightweight doesn't happen. PHP is bulky, slow, inefficient, and
has a security record which resembles that of Windows or sendmail.
--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
