On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 04:38:52 -0500, Miguel Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:08:07 -0400
Adam Weinberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Personally, I'd love to see /usr/X11R6 folded into /usr/local, but until
then, I think it's nothing short of retarded for apps to install into
unusual locations to prove a point.

It might be interesting looking at the work the pkgsrc people have done wrt $PREFIX enforcement. On my NetBSD boxen xorg lives under /usr/pkg/xorg and all packages are installed under /usr/pkg, not /usr/X11R6 or /usr/local.

I disagree with NetBSD's PREFIX. I would go with the global prefix, /usr/local. 85% of configure has the /usr/local by default and FreeBSD already has /usr/local (to kill the colour discussions), so all we have to do is remove /usr/X11R6. Before you ask how we can test if the port is respect the prefix, we should be able to find out very easy when you work with pkg-plist by follow the porter handbook.


BTW: FreeBSD doesn't has to be weird. :-)

Cheers,
Mezz

Cheers,


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to