On Mon, 2005-28-03 at 16:21 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > But defective hardware is hardware that fails to do its job, and these > drives have done their jobs under Windows NT for eight years.
I'm not an NT fan myself, but from reading your past posts, it seems to do everything you need far better than freebsd. Why not just stick with NT/2k? Just curious. Chris
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
