In the last episode (Oct 28), Vivek Khera said:
> >>>>> "DN" == Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DN> When you did the install, you probably just skipped that options dialog
> DN> that came up, right? All the options on that page are "select to
> DN> enable", except CUPS which is "select to _disable". Rebuild samba, and
> DN> select the "Without CUPS" line. Quite annoying. I work around it by
> DN> adding WITHOUT_CUPS=yes in /etc/make.conf, and setting BATCH=yes in
> DN> net/samba/Makefile.
>
> CUPS is linked in both 2.2.5 and 2.2.6, but in 2.2.6 it seems to want
> to actually *use* it even though I don't configure it.
>
> Also, if I select the "Disable CUPS" flag, all it accomplishes is to
> not register the dependency. CUPS is still linked for some reason.
Ah. The port Makefile probably needs to be tweaked a bit then. It
looks like samba will use cups if it can find it. Try this:
diff -u -r1.104 Makefile
--- Makefile 17 Oct 2002 13:49:31 -0000 1.104
+++ Makefile 28 Oct 2002 17:26:04 -0000
@@ -123,6 +125,8 @@
LIB_DEPENDS+= cups.2:${PORTSDIR}/print/cups-base
CONFIGURE_ENV+= CPPFLAGS=-I${LOCALBASE}/include \
LDFLAGS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib
+.else
+CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --without-cups
.endif
.if defined(KRB5_HOME) && exists(${KRB5_HOME})
> Does your smbd have cups linked (as reported by ldd)?
No, since I don't have the cups port installed, so samba couldn't use
it.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
