https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240084
--- Comment #6 from John W. O'Brien <j...@saltant.com> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #5) I haven't studied the consumer dependents, nor pandas 1.0 for that matter, so I do not know whether any would have a problem chasing that update. Perhaps the best course of action would be to make a 25 port with a 3 month (e.g.) expiration, switching all consumers over to it and leaving it up to the respective maintainers to validate and adopt 1.0. Any consumer that still aims to support Python 2 would also still need access to a 24 port. It may no longer be worthwhile to implement the MUP-based dependency selection for py2/py3, because some consumers may need a 24/25 swing while others would prefer the 24/1.0 swing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
