https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231392
--- Comment #23 from Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunp...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Ting-Wei Lan from comment #21) Instead of -extras, I would prefer current naming which is clear enough. And what if other ports require different options? But I don't like the combination of options. It would be more flexible if a port enables only one option. Regarding the patch, it looks strange to me. Why not use OPTIONS_EXCLUDE rather than redefining OPTIONS_DEFINE? What if we move the OPTIONS from Makefile to another file (e.g. options.mk). Let py-fonttools-foo include that file and add py-fonttools and foo_RUN_DEPENDS to RUN_DEPENDS. If a port requires fonttools[foo] and fonttools[bar], you could add py-fonttools-foo and py-fonttools-bar to RUN_DEPENDS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
