On, Tue Jan 21, 2014, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > Marcus von Appen wrote on 21.01.2014 14:48: > > Dear all, > > > > most python ports, which install into PYTHON_SITELIBDIR or PYTHON_LIBDIR > > use an explicit PKGNAMEPREFIX assignment to mark the resulting packages as > > related to a specific python version. > > The porter's handbook also outlines that ports should stick to this > > practice. > > > > I would like to force the usage of PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX for ports, which use > > distutils (and hence are always targeting a specific python version), by > > implicitly setting PKGNAMEPREFIX=PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX in bsd.python.mk. This > > makes port Makefiles less error-prone and ensures that the ports stick to a > > common naming scheme, when it comes to packages. > > > > At the same time, I would like to deprecate and remove PYTHON_PKGNAMESUFFIX, > > since it has no practical use or relevance other than creating an > > inconsistent > > package naming scheme. Its original purpose (to be read in r91400) does not > > hold true in my opinion, and I am explaining the reaon(s) for that (among > > other things when it comes to naming python ports) at > > http://www.sysfault.org/posts/freebsd-python-ports-pre-suffix.html. > > > > If noone speaks up, I'll start with the necessary changes to the > > infrastructure soon. > > > > Cheers > > Marcus > > Like the suffix idea! > I just want to add, that it would be great to also automatically adjust > DOCSDIR and EXAMPLESDIR with correct prefix to make docs/examples, > installed by single port, but for different python version > simultaneously. This will help to avoid conflicts. > > Right now we have this (py-gnupg is just random python port): > # make -V DOCSDIR /usr/ports/security/py-gnupg > /usr/local/share/doc/gnupg > > So right now it ever may conflict with gnupg docs, if I understand > correctly. I think that correct dirname would be: > /usr/local/share/doc/py27-gnupg for python 2.7 > and > /usr/local/share/doc/py33-gnupg for python 3.3
This already has been done and currently waits for an exp-run. You might have missed the mails about it the other day: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python/2013-December/006402.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python/2013-December/006404.html Patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mva/python_unique_ports_v7.diff PR for the exp-run: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/185947 As soon as the exp-run has been done and the issues were fixed, it will be committed. Cheers Marcus
pgpDCS3JVcsws.pgp
Description: PGP signature
