Li-Wen Hsu wrote on 01.10.2012 22:11:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 22:03:48 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Li-Wen Hsu wrote on 01.10.2012 21:51:
EXTRACT_SUFX?= .tgz
PYTHON_DISTFILE= Python-${PYTHON_PORTVERSION:S/.rc/rc/}}${EXTRACT_SUFX}
Yes, I also bow to this option.
then we can define USE_XZ= yes in the ports we want to use xz
distfile, which handles
${EXTRACT_SUFX} and ${EXTRACT_DEPENDS} correctly. After python26 decommission,
we can even move this into bsd.python.mk
python26 distributes in tar.xz too [1]. Or you meant something other?
Ok, so I get the point. I'll prepare an patch that make ${EXTRACT_SUFX}
redefinable for python ports, so we can gradually switch all this ports
to xz. Thanks Marcus and Li-Wen.
[1] http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.6.8/Python-2.6.8.tar.xz
Oh I was not aware that, I just did not see XZ information at:
http://python.org/download/releases/2.6.8/
So maybe we can simply put USE_XZ= yes in bsd.python.mk now.
So we returned to initial question :). Is this acceptable to do this,
because it will require all the distinfos change "w/o a reason"? I
didn't see anything criminal there, but other people may know better.
--
Regards,
Ruslan
Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
