Greg Larkin wrote on 12.11.2011 01:26: > On 11/11/11 7:30 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> Good day! > >> We have two pr's here: >> http://bugs.freebsd.org/155524 >> http://bugs.freebsd.org/155526 > >> And the last consumer of them in the tree was fixed today. >> Since python 2.5 we have xml.etree.ElementTree and >> xml.etree.cElementTree in the standard library. This package are drop-in >> replacement for aforementioned ports, except of HTMLTreeBuilder class >> that is missing. But we don't have ports that use it anyway. > >> All the modern software uses or bundled xml.etree or lxml >> (devel/py-lxml) or html5lib (www/py-html5lib) instead. So i want to ask >> is there any objections if I mark them deprecated and remove in one month? > > > > My sense is these ports should be set to expire at the same time as > python 2.4. When is that change going to be made to its Makefile? > > Regards, > Greg
Fair enough. I assumed that nobody actually using python 2.4, while asking that. I believe Martin knows better when 2.4 will be set to expire :) -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
