I don't have a strong opinion but I'd go with the option no.2 Li-Wen Hsu píše v so 05. 03. 2011 v 01:13 +0800:
> Since there is no feedback (to my question) on freebsd-python list (CC'd), > I would like to listen the opinion from portmgr about the best naming of > these ports, perhaps we need a regexp about "valid package name" in the > porter's handbook? > > Regards, > Li-Wen > > ----- Forwarded message from Li-Wen Hsu <lw...@freebsd.org> ----- > > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:50:45 +0800 > From: Li-Wen Hsu <lw...@freebsd.org> > To: pyt...@freebsd.org > Subject: What's the perfered name for zope related modules? > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) > > Hello all, > > I'm working on www/py-pyramid port, which needs some other zope ports to > be added. And I found we have following naming in the tree: > > - py-zopeInterface > - py-zope.exceptions > - py-zopetesting > > From [1], first one is not suggested, though we have many in the tree. > And I am not sure '.' would affect the other parts, but if it does, > it should already caused problem since we have also ports like > openoffice.org php-mode.el in tree. If not, I like second one because > third one could cause other naming conflicts. > > Regards, > Li-Wen > > [1] > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#PORTING-PKGNAME > > -- > Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu AT FreeBSD.org> > http://lwhsu.org > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > -- -- Pav Lucistnik <p...@oook.cz> <p...@freebsd.org> Stupidity got us into this mess -- why can't it get us out?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
