The following reply was made to PR ports/138837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Southwell <da...@vizion2000.net> To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, da...@vizion2000.net Cc: Subject: Re: ports/138837: lang/python26 compile failure Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:07:36 +0100 Re: ports/138835: Python compile failure Now 138837 !!! From: David Southwell <da...@vizion2000.net> To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, da...@vizion2000.net CC: m...@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports-b...@freebsd.org As reported by Ralph Kenyon <ken...@kenyonralph.com> >On 2009-09-15T10:08:52+0100, David Southwell <da...@vizion2000.net> wrote: > > I want to understand why bug reports get closed prematurely and without any > > discussion with the original person submitting the report. ... > > Yrs frustrated > > David Southwell > >ps the PR link is: >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138835 > >(ports/138835: Python compile failure) >I am wondering the same thing. extra-patch-setup.py is wrong. miwi's >"can't confirm" post in ports/138835 doesn't even show the patch being >applied. >Here is the rejects file: >*************** >*** 1273,1279 **** ) libraries = [] - elif platform in ('freebsd4', 'freebsd5', 'freebsd6', 'freebsd7', 'freebsd8'): # FreeBSD's P1003.1b semaphore support is very experimental # and has many known problems. (as of June 2008) macros = dict( # FreeBSD --- 1277,1283 ---- ) libraries = [] + elif platform in ('freebsd4', 'freebsd5', 'freebsd6', 'freebsd7', 'freebsd8', 'freebsd9'): # FreeBSD's P1003.1b semaphore support is very experimental # and has many known problems. (as of June 2008) macros = dict( # FreeBSD >Kenyon Ralph >End of signed message This bug now has a new PR Link is: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138837 _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
