On 2021-Apr-2, at 20:24, The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:45:56AM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
>> Once it is publicly mentioned that the conversion is completed run the
>> following command:
>>
>> sed -e '/github.com/d' -e 's/freebsd\/freebsd-//g' /usr/local/etc/gitup.conf
>>
>> then do `gitup ports`
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Moin
>>
>>> On 3 Apr, 2021, at 07:20, The Doctor via freebsd-ports
>>> <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:54:48PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2021-Apr-2, at 17:41, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> . . .
>>>>
>>>
>>> So what patch is needed to fix the ports issue?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> =. . .
>>>
>>> . . .
>>
>
> 50/50 .
>
> FreeBSD 13.0-RC workstation works.
>
> Ns2 works
>
> ns1 is hung up.
>
So far I'm unable to interpret the above as a reply
to Moin's text. 50/50? Ns2? ns1? 13.0-RC<missing?>?
How does that match up to the sed suggestion?
Also, the conversion has not been made accessible
yet from what I can tell. For example,
https://cgit.freebsd.org/
lists "doc" and "src" but not (yet) "ports".
So, likely:
https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git
and:
ssh://anon...@git.freebsd.org/ports.git
are also not working notations yet.
Thus, removing github.com references in a way that
would try to use one of the above would mean not
finding a ports repository at all (yet). (Justifying
Moin's "Once it is publicly mentioned that the
conversion is completed . . ." wording?)
(I've no clue if the specifics of the sed suggestion
are correct or not.)
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
