On Thursday, 25 March 2021 13:00:02 CET freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: > The idea is to try to have www/qt5-webengine fixed before the expiration > time, saving with it a bunch of innocent ports depending on it, correct?
In the sense of "have one guy take a stab at it over the weekend because multi-billion-dollar companies can't be arsed", yes. I'm not sure what the situation over in Linux-land is. [ade] PS1. I'm going to primarily blame Google; the Qt Company, though, is far from blameless in its maintainence of WebEngine (or lack thereof). I have hope for TurtleBrowser, but they are also kind of waiting on me for a breakthrough on the Python3 front. PS2. Works-in-progress are the branches *webengine-python3* (old, but does complete an entire build that then doesn't actually **work**) and *webengine- logpy27* (new, currently more hacky, doesn't build) in the https://github.com/ freebsd/freebsd-ports-kde.git ports repo.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
