Greetings,
UIDs and GIDs are also not resprected, i could solve this via this patch:
Index: Mk/bsd.port.mk
===================================================================
--- Mk/bsd.port.mk (Revision 563120)
+++ Mk/bsd.port.mk (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1274,8 +1274,17 @@
# where 'make config' records user configuration options
PORT_DBDIR?= /var/db/ports
+# add support for overlaying UIDs and GIDs, dont include them if they
dont exist
+.if exists(${OVERLAYS}/UIDs)
+UID_FILES?= ${OVERLAYS}/UIDs ${PORTSDIR}/UIDs
+.else
UID_FILES?= ${PORTSDIR}/UIDs
+.endif
+.if exists(${OVERLAYS}/GIDs)
+GID_FILES?= ${OVERLAYS}/GIDs ${PORTSDIR}/GIDs
+.else
GID_FILES?= ${PORTSDIR}/GIDs
+.endif
UID_OFFSET?= 0
GID_OFFSET?= 0
Maybe this could be implented upstream to support overlaying GIDs and UIDs
Kind regards,
Henrik Rosenke
Am 27.01.21 um 17:57 schrieb Henrik Rosenke:
Greetings,
i just added the overlay to my portstree, works good and great
addition. I wonder how you handle moved ports with this? As example we
are using a adapted Version of sysutils/sge62 with own patches but i
need to remove this Line in MOVED on the Original portstree to allow
building it. Is there a way to handle such exceptions or do i need to
rename it? Is there any Documentation about this?
Kind regards,
Henrik Rosenke
Am 25.01.21 um 16:28 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
On 25/01/2021 15:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 10:23:45PM +0100, Guido Falsi via
freebsd-ports wrote:
On 24/01/21 20:35, Russell L. Carter wrote:
Greetings,
I am completely ignorant here and am looking for up to
date advice on how to get poudriere to build and make
available package sets from multiple ports trees. I
see there is a port "portshaker" that seems to do much
of what I want.
[...]
BTW I noticed poudriere performs shallow clones for git repos, so
it should
not use up a lot of disk space.
Why not using directly overlays, it will simplify everything ;)
I don't know if you read me reply or not - I am using poudriere with
ports
overlay but have a problem with it. Poudriere options does not take
overlay
in to account so ports options cannot be configured for overlayed ports
which do not exist in the base three.
Is there a way to fix it / should I file a PR for it?
Kind regards
Miroslav Lachman
Yes I read it and for sure poudriere option not supporting overlays is a
limitation, and yes a PR would help to not forget about implementing it.
That said most people aren't using poudriere option and prefer to
define option
directly via make.conf for them overlay is fully suited, and avoid
the risk or
dangerous merging of trees may it be via portshaker, or git mechanism.
there are room of improvements for overlays but it should work in
most cases
Best regards,
Bapt
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
