On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:44:58 +0300 Yuri Pankov <ypan...@xsmail.com> wrote:
> >>> With latest ports tree librsvg2-rust-2.50.0 is required to some > >>> ports. It want replace librsvg2-2.40.21. > >>> > >>> I do not want build ugly rust during hours to build small lib in > >>> less than minute. > >> > >> You might want to send your complaints to librsvg authors, or fork > >> the before-the-rust version and maintain it; ports list really > >> seems to be a wrong target for this discussion. > >> > > > > This done not by librsvg authors. > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18878 > > > > And "# Use librsvg2-rust where lang/rust is available" means that > > it is not required for all other arch. > > It is done in the latest version of librsvg, namely 2.50, and > starting from that version rust is required to build (not to run > though, AFAIK). The arches on which FreeBSD doesn't have working rust > yet are to keep older version (2.40) for the moment, but that is only > temporary workaround as you might understand. I do not care that 2.50 > 2.40, I care only that it requires heavy dep. > BTW, `pkg install rust` should solve the "build ugly rust during > hours" problem for you. I use portmaster and do not want do some actions by hand, and pkg install may reinstall some of my apps. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
