matt...@freebsd.org <matt...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 23/06/2020 12:08, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Hmm, but that information doesn't help me regarding my question above: >> Where does poudriere store .meta files during compilations? >> META_MODE doesn't make sense, IMHO, if this information isn't stored >> somewhere before being reused in subsequent compilations of a given port. Or >> am I mistaken? > > META_MODE is a feature of building FreeBSD itself, not for building ports. > So, unless you're using the rather bleeding edge poudriere(1) work to be able > to build base system packages, poudriere is simply not going to be dealing > with .meta files. Thanks, that's what I have "feared": I misunderstood the scope of bdrewery's commit regarding /etc/src-env.conf > What you can do for poudriere is enable CCACHE -- as described in the > referenced article. This makes quite a bit of difference to recompiling some > of the bigger ports like LLVM, but will have very little effect on the > majority of ports that only take a matter of a few seconds to compile. Even > so, it's well worth doing overall. My first reaction after anticipating increase in compilation times has been: activating CCACHE ;-) And thanks again, you clarified yet another "fear" of mine, namely, that it will only speed-up larger ports. Thanks to all, Michael _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
