On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 21:38:44 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:55 PM Wiebe Pestman <wrpest...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear maintainer(s), >> Today I tried to install the port avidemux-2.7.4_1, but unfortunately >> without success. >> When running the command "make install" the whole process proceeds >> without any error message. >> But at the end there is no binary ... >> Neither in /usr/local/bin, nor in >> >> /usr/ports/multimedia/avidemux/work/stage/usr/local/bin >> >> Am I overlooking something in the installation procedure? >> The kernel on my machine is: >> >> FreeBSD zwaluw 12.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE r354233 GENERIC amd64 >> >> Hope to get an answer from you :-) >> Best regards from Holland, >> Wiebe Pestman > > avidemux does not install any executable. Oddly, it just installs libraries > and the like. You must also install avidemux-plugins and either or both > avidemux-cli and avidemux-qt5. If you only need the GUI, you can skip > avidemux-cli. > > The command to run the GUI version of avidemux is avidemux3_qt5. The CLI > interface is avidemux3_cli.
Yes, I've run into this problem too. Arguably it's broken. The official documentation expects it to be a single installation, and I don't see any reason to split avidemux into five ports (there's also avidemux-qt4). What good is the avidemux port on its own? Or the combination of avidemux-qt5 without avidemux-plugins? Just finding out that you need all this stuff is a pain. I'd recommend folding both of these ports, and probably avidemux-cli, into the ports avidemux-qt4 and avidemux-qt5. At the very least there should be a warning in avidemux/pkg-descr, but I don't think that's the right approach. Thoughts? Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger g...@freebsd.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
