Am 18.04.20 um 18:40 schrieb D'Arcy Cain: > On 2020-04-18 10:18, ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: >> BTW, I do not know why some apps need llvm60 still: > I really wish there was only one llvm. It's one of those things that > can take days to build. A minor upgrade can trigger multiple rebuilds. > In my case only llvm80 and llvm90 but still. In my experience, LLVM responds rather well to ccache installed. It can occasionally get slow, but if it's just about a single file, ccache helps massively. GCC benefits less (if at all) from ccache. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
- Re: python 2.7 marked as deprecated and EOL while... Dimitry Andric
- Re: python 2.7 marked as deprecated and EOL ... Robert Huff
- Re: python 2.7 marked as deprecated and ... George Mitchell
- Re: python 2.7 marked as deprecated ... Robert Huff
- Re: python 2.7 marked as depreca... Matthew Seaman
- Re: python 2.7 marked as de... Bob Eager
- Re: python 2.7 marked as de... andrew clarke
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... D'Arcy Cain
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... ajtiM via freebsd-ports
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... D'Arcy Cain
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Matthias Andree
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... D'Arcy Cain
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Matthias Andree
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Christoph Moench-Tegeder
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Thierry Thomas
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Christoph Moench-Tegeder
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Christoph Moench-Tegeder
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Thierry Thomas
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Thierry Thomas
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Loïc Bartoletti
- Re: python 2.7 marked a... Kevin Oberman