On 25/01/2020 16:38, starik...@dismail.de wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 14:07:57 +0100 > Xavier <xav...@groumpf.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I looked at the posts from 22/01 about cblas/openblas, and ran in the >> very same problem. So I delete cblas, and let openblas running an >> upgrade. But pkg check -Bd show e an error, which is not fixed by >> rebuilding py37-numpy (twice): >> >>> py37-scipy is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so >> >> The library exists : >>> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 25 11:59 >>> /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.so@ -> libopenblas.so.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 >>> root wheel 31038608 Jan 25 11:59 /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.so.0* >> >> What can I do now ? >> >> TIA, >> >> Cheers, >> >> Xavier >> > > I have same old work with py37-scipy and everything works... > I try the example from now and it works. > Please, check the attached jpg. > Yes, indeed it works, because it is not a dependency problem, but a problem in pkg database, I verified it with a port exhibiting the problem, for which I'm sure there's shared libs :
> [root@numenor ~]# pkg check -Bd suitesparse > Checking suitesparse: 100% > suitesparse is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so But, when checking manually : > [root@numenor ~]# pkg list suitesparse |grep \.so$ |xargs ldd|grep openblas > libopenblas.so => /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.so (0x801c00000) > libopenblas.so => /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.so (0x801a00000) > libopenblas.so => /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.so (0x801600000) In conclusion, I can safely ignore those errors I dunno whether the problem is in the packaging of the concerned port, or openblas. So, I Cc the maintainers Regards, Xavier -- Xavier Humbert - sysadmin & network engineer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
