On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:26:51 -0700 Kevin Oberman <rkober...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Today I was hit with 226 ports needing update. With one exception, > all were the result of the bump or the default gcc version to 9.1. > The problem is that 9.1 was not installed first, so over 43 of these > ports were rebuilt with the exact same compiler it was built with > before the rebuild, eating up 2:45 of time on my build system. I'm > sure if was less for many as my build system is over 8 years old. It > was non-trivial in any case. > > Should an install of gcc9 preceded all updates? Perhaps a note in > UPDATING? I certainly looked there before I started when I saw 226 > ports in the list. > > Should I rebuild the ports that were rebuilt prior to the > installation of gcc-9.1? > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" I had the same problem and some ports I rebuilt again. They should put something in /usr/ports/UPDATING. -- “Hungry man, reach for the book: it is a weapon.” ― Bertolt Brecht _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
