> On Apr 8, 2019, at 4:38 PM, Mathieu Arnold <m...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 01:55:19PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: >> re: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19562 >> >> I understand the purpose of the blacklist is to restrict the use of certain >> meta ports to end-users only. That is, the meta-ports in question should >> not be used as a depends in the FreeBSD ports tree. >> >> For example, do not use lang/python as a depends. Let the user install that >> install. >> >> With my user hat on, who has a in-house meta-port which includes >> lang/python2 as a depends, because we want it, and list of other stuff >> installed. >> >> We can't do that now. Our meta-port is broken and can no longer be used. Is >> there another way? The list appears hardcoded and no way for the end user to >> configure. > > Well, that is not correct. QA checks are only run when using poudriere > testport or bulk -t, or when DEVELOPER=yes. So, while it is true that > such meta port will no longer pass testing, it will not impact a normal > poudriere bulk.
That's good news. Yes, I discovered this on a testport, while amending an in-house port. Phew. Sorry for the noise. This got me completely kerfuffled. cheers.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
