Sean Bruno <sbr...@freebsd.org> writes:

> On 3/23/19 5:57 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> This is fallout of <https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345349>,
>> which enabled --no-allow-shlib-undefined by default.  See also
>> <https://bugs.freebsd.org/236141>.  Executive summary: lots of programs
>> do not specify all their required libraries, a.k.a. "under-linking".
>> 
>> I haven't yet reverted lld's new default, since it seems that a lot of
>> under-linking fixes are now being made.  These problems will also occur
>> when linking with gold, for instance, so it is quite useful to solve
>> them once and for all.
>> 
>> -Dimitry
>
> Oh, hrm.  Ok.
>
> So, before the changes, my port succeeds in adding libogg to its LD list
> when doing its link.

LLD before and BFD linker didn't complain that your port bootlegged
libogg via libvorbis. For one, libvorbis may stop depending on libogg,
may bundle libogg as a static library or import libogg symbols with
LOCAL visibility.

Ditto for libssl bootlegging libcrypto.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to