> On Aug 24, 2018, at 5:56 PM, Tobias Kortkamp <to...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, at 22:49, Dan Langille wrote: >>> On Jul 29, 2018, at 6:51 AM, Jochen Neumeister <jon...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> Author: joneum >>> Date: Sun Jul 29 10:51:37 2018 >>> New Revision: 475644 >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/475644 >>> >>> Log: >>> databases/mantis: Update to 2.15.0 >>> >>> Changelog: >>> https://mantisbt.org/bugs/changelog_page.php?project=mantisbt&version=2.15.0 >>> >>> PR: 229880 >>> Submitted by: Nathan <ndowens.f...@yandex.com> >>> MFH: 2018Q3 >>> Security: 0822a4cf-9318-11e8-8d88-00e04c1ea73d >>> >>> Modified: >>> head/databases/mantis/Makefile >>> head/databases/mantis/distinfo >> >> This version fails to run for me. The vendor directory is missing. >> This is the error I get: >> >> [Mon Aug 20 20:40:14.528249 2018] [:error] [pid 73365] [client redacted] >> PHP Warning: require_once(/usr/local/www/mantis/vendor/autoload.php): >> failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/local/www/ >> mantis/core.php on line 71 >> [Mon Aug 20 20:40:14.528317 2018] [:error] [pid 73365] [client redacted] >> PHP Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required '/usr/local/ >> www/mantis/vendor/autoload.php' (include_path='/usr/local/share/pear') >> in /usr/local/www/mantis/core.php on line 71 >> >> Is this working for anyone? >> >> There was no vendor directory in the 2.6.0 tarball. There isn't one in >> the 2.15.0 tarball either, but the code definitely references it. >> >> Upstream inquires >> (https://mantisbt.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=66190#p66190 >> <https://mantisbt.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=66190#p66190>) indicate we >> should be using Sourceforge downloads, not GitHub >> >> The vendor directory is present in the SF tarball at >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mantisbt/files/mantis-stable/2.16.0/ >> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/mantisbt/files/mantis-stable/2.16.0/> >> >> I tried last night to update the port, but failed. >> >> Ideas please? > > Hi, > > could you test the update to 2.16.0 on https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16890 > <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16890> ? > I've switched it over to the SF tarball and it seems to work ok > for me, but would appreciate a confirmation from someone else that > it works before committing it. > > Thanks!
The patch does not apply cleanly to the Makefile for me, so I applied it manually. It builds, it runs. A patch against head is belowl I create diffs against head and uploaded them here: https://gist.github.com/dlangille/a9de194209795a4261eebbd3de65e841 <https://gist.github.com/dlangille/a9de194209795a4261eebbd3de65e841> One is for the Makefile, the other is for the whole port. Hope this helps. Thank you, your work got me running again. I look forward to the commit. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon d...@langille.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
