On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:24:06AM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > On 15. Jun 2018, at 10:10 AM, Mahmoud Al-Qudsi <mqu...@neosmart.net> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:57 AM, Michael Gmelin <free...@grem.de> wrote: > >> Last time I checked, building git without Perl broke submodules (which is > >> a core feature that should work with a default installation). > > > > I fully agree. Fortunately, (at least at a first glance) that does not > > seem to be the case. > > The bottom line is that excluding Perl and Python support from git > will make it only usable for automated shell scripting. > > Interactive parts require Perl or Python so there is nothing to be > gained from breaking POLA for existing users of the git FreeBSD > package or git software in general as any random tutorial out there > may not work for FreeBSD anymore. > > For emphasis, this is suboptimal at best... > The best here is to wait for subpackages, which would allow to have git, git-python, git-perl or something like that
Bapt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
