On 2/26/18 9:45 AM, Yuri wrote: > Can it/should it be assigned to enlightenm...@freebsd.org?
For new ports, it's a defacto, strongly encouraged guideline that new ports should be MAINTAINER'd by the person who authored it, for reasons outlined: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html and https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing/ports-contributing.html#maintain-port > Does enlightenm...@freebsd.org need to be asked if they want to maintain > it? Yes, unless a team has explicitly said that its OK (the python team for python ports is close to this). But this (new port) is different than existing ports who's maintainers are being reset. > Or the submitter should maintain it? Yes, all else being equal, in almost all cases, unless there is a good reason not to (say its a very important, highly impactful port that *should* be maintained by the ports team responsible for that software ecosystem) > > Yuri > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
