On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:49:24AM +0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > No, that's a misunderstood. Let the maintainer for the port (I don't > really want the port). It is better one maintainer make all elastisearch > > ports. It was a request on FreeBSD Forum for elasticsearch6. First I > updated elasticsearch5 and as I was "in work" I make the PR for > > elasticsearch6. It was committed very quick. But I never wanted to > override or overrule a maintainer.
Ooops, ETOOLATE :-) BTW, assigning maintainership to someone is not a great idea, and as noted in the previous e-mail, tj@ has not committed to the ports repository in the last 6 month. You can request to drop maintainership, but in this case, maybe it wasn't worth doing a port? -- Romain Tartière <rom...@freebsd.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~romain/ pgp: 8234 9A78 E7C0 B807 0B59 80FF BA4D 1D95 5112 336F (ID: 0x5112336F) (plain text =non-HTML= PGP/GPG encrypted/signed e-mail much appreciated)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
