Hello;
On 13/12/2017 21:11, Chris H wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:56:24 -0500 "Pedro Giffuni" <p...@freebsd.org> said
On 12/10/17 14:55, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 11.12.2017 2:22, Pedro Giffuni пишет:
>> Hello guys;
>>
>> I would like to attempt a port for WPS Office (AKA Kingsoft Office):
>>
>> http://wps-community.org/
>>
>> Are there guidelines for linux ports? I couldn't find much details
in the
> handbook.
>>
>> In particular, how do you handle when the pkg-plist is different
for i386
> and amd64?
>>
>> Some ports use pkg-plist.${ARCH} but I don't know how those work.
> Just have "USES=linux", "USE_LINUX_RPM=yes" and make these two files
> pkg-plist.i386 and pkg-plist.amd64
> and they are used automatically. Or you could duplicate a magic from
> /ports/Mk/Uses/linux.mk in your Makefile:
>
> PLIST?= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-plist.${LINUX_ARCH:S/x86_64/amd64/}
>
> For details, read Porter's Handbook:
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/
>
The handbook has no information about "USE_LINUX_RPM=yes".
If I set that it appears the ports framework will ignore MASTER_SITES.
Should I dig into the MK framework to see how to change the
repository or should I use the .tar.xz distribution instead? :(.
I'm not sure. But would having a look at the way
emulators/linux_base-c(6|7)
provide some clues?
Not really but I think I found something in Mk/Uses/linux.mk:
For the case of USE_LINUX_RPM it is supposed to not do anything when
MASTER_SITES is defined but it is somewhat messy, and somehow it always
uses ${MASTER_SITE_CENTOS_LINUX}. Any port that uses RPM but not the
Centos repositories?
Just a thought, and hope it helps!
Thanks, I just have to keep digging :(.
Pedro.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
