> On 5 Dec, 2017, at 0:35, Stefan Esser <s...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Am 05.12.17 um 00:43 schrieb Tatsuki Makino: >> By the way, where is the clever way to update to flavor? >> I am using portmaster. > > I'm working on FLAVOR support in portmaster. My version did already build > all updated ports, the FLAVOR parameter is passed to build sub-processes, > but there is still some confusion between multiple flavored versions of the > same port (installing the py27 version wants to deinstall the py36 version > and vice versa), which I still have to fix. > > I'm not sure that I have time to complete the fix today, but it is not too > hard. Ports need to complement the port origin with the FLAVOR, where > appropriate (e.g. when a flavored destination is found in MOVED). Already > installed packages are annotated with "flavor" and that must be passed to > the build command, when that port is updated. Most other logic in portmaster > remains unaffected. > > > My work version has all non PKG_NG support stripped, but that is mainly to > not waste effort fixing irrelevant sub-routines. > > Is it acceptable, to have portmaster stop supporting the old package system? > AFAIK, there is no way that a modern ports tree with flavor support works > with a non-PKG_NG infrastructure? > > Regards, STefan
Thank you for doing the work!!! Yes, old package (PKG_OG?) support should be removed. Even if portmaster supported it, the ports tree itself doesn't. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger ad...@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
