On 2017-Sep-5, at 1:33 PM, Mark Millard <mar...@dsl-only.net> wrote: > On 2017-Sep-5, at 1:13 PM, Jan Beich <jbeich at FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net> writes: >> >>> In an experiment with building some arm ports via poudriere >>> cross building on amd64 I got the following. It appears that >>> clang does not handle all the assembler notation and a >>> different assembler might need to be used for x11/pixman . >>> (The x11/pixman usage is indirect from having specified >>> x11/lumina and x11/xscreensaver ). >>> >>> --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- >>> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H >>> -I. -I.. -mcpu=cortex-a7 -O2 -pipe -mcpu=cortex-a7 -g >>> -fno-strict-aliasing -MT pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo -MD -MP -MF >>> .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c -o pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo >>> pixman-arm-simd-asm.S >>> libtool: compile: /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. >>> -mcpu=cortex-a7 -O2 -pipe -mcpu=cortex-a7 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -MT >>> pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c >>> pixman-arm-simd-asm.S -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/pixman-arm-simd-asm.o >>> <instantiation>:1:1: error: unknown directive >>> . . . >>> --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- >>> .func fname >>> ^ >> >> Does it still happen after https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/449285 >> ? > > . . . > This is based on /usr/ports having -r449313 . (I updated based on > your question.) > . . .
The rebuild of the ports rebuilt x11/pixman earlier in the sequence than I had guessed so it took less time to get to that point: [00:51:26] [03] [00:00:00] Building x11/pixman | pixman-0.34.0 . . . [00:54:15] [03] [00:02:49] Finished x11/pixman | pixman-0.34.0: Success So -r449285 has avoided using clang's internal assembler. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
