On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
[Default] On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 07:12:36 -0400, I wrote:
[Default] On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:45:58 +0200, Jan Beich
<jbe...@freebsd.org> wrote:
<scratch65...@att.net> writes:
[Default] On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:46:44 +0200, Jan Beich
<jbe...@freebsd.org> wrote:
<scratch65...@att.net> writes:
Package dependency requirement 'giomm-2.4 >= 2.49.1' could not be
satisfied.
$ pkg which -o /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/giomm-2.4.pc
/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/giomm-2.4.pc was installed by package devel/glibmm
We might be talking at crossed purposes, here. The makefile did
indeed install 2.4, but that's not 2.49.1 (note that it's "2.49"
not "2.4.9"). 2.49 is not visible in my
freshly-updated-just-before-these-build-attempts ports tree. .
The version number seems goofed up. Why would it ever imagine
that 2.4 is 2.49? There doesn't seem to be a rule that version
numbers are truncated to 1 digit after the decimal point.
Okay, I'd not noticed til now that there does seem to be a
truncate convention, which seems counterproductive t'me. So what
looks like v2.4 could be v2.4 or v2.49 or even, theoretically,
v2.49999. Not much information in a single digit.
Have you checked the Makefile of devel/glibmm? The version actually is
2.50.1 so it should match 'giomm-2.4 >= 2.49.1'. You obviously have
an old version installed. 'pkg version -n glibmm'?
But in any event it's not 2.49, and the "2.4" I installed is the
only "2.4" in the ports tree. Reinstalling won't help.
Just try what jbeich@ told you. Or use pkg!
--
Herbert
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
