On 28-7-2017 09:21, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 27/07/2017 09:30, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >> On 27-7-2017 01:43, mokhi wrote: >>> Aha, >>> Okay... >>> Good if it works :) >>> >> >> It is a gross hack, but it gets me going for the time being. >> >> Also needed to fight with ninja. >> Turns out that somebody changed my old port to include noninja, without >> telling me... :( > > That change would be related to r444324 > http://leader/viewvc/viewvc.cgi/FreeBSD-ports?view=revision&revision=444324 > > Your port uses cmake, which previously would use make to build your > port. The options to use ninja instead of make was an option but is now > the default as speed improvements on larger projects were found. The > addition of USES= cmake:noninja means your port failed using ninja > during the tests of that change, which means it was left to build the > same way it was before the change.
ninja complains about problems with $'s. And since this project also needs to work with cmake/gmake on Linux, I'm not even going to try to meddle with this. Assuming that the current combo is going to stay workable? --WjW _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
