> On 12. Apr 2017, at 11:37, Alexey Dokuchaev <da...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:43:14AM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>> On 12. Apr 2017, at 05:43, Alexey Dokuchaev <da...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> ... >>> pkg was eating 100% (of a single core) during that time, so it looks >>> like it's actually busy (not waiting for I/O or something), but with >>> what? And can it be fixed? LLVM ports are real PITA to (re)build, >>> and while ccache helps to greatly reduce the build times, 3/4-hour >>> package time still cripples it. >> >> It's probably busy compressing the package. Try setting PKG_NOCOMPRESS=1 >> in /etc/make.conf (works ok when just building a package with make, >> didn't test with poudriere[0]). When creating packages, the current >> compression algorithm can't take advantage of multiple cores, so it's >> kind of a bottleneck on modern machines. > > That is my current best guest as well, but I could not confirm it because > /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static is stripped by default and I could not see any > function names when I attached gdb(1) to it. Will rebuild pkg(8) shortly > WITH_DEBUG to get more information. > > Other alternative to PKG_NOCOMPRESS=1 could be PKGSUFFIX=.tbz (pkg-static > create -f tbz ...), will play with that as well.
I don't think bzip will buy you much in terms of performance, supporting something like lz4 would be useful. -m _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
