[Default] On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:02:13 +0100, Christian Ullrich <ch...@chrullrich.net> wrote:
>* scratch65...@att.net wrote: > >> Does anyone have a clue as to why sqlite3 is now being installed >> with MariaDB 10.1? The mariadb site doesn't mention it, as far > >Because you have set your ports options in such a way that the MariaDB >port depends on something (that depends on something)* that in turn >depends on SQLite. databases/mariadb101-server itself does not have, nor >can it be configured to have, a dependency on databases/sqlite3. > >Installing this one port brings in 41 more as dependencies (on my system >as of right now), so there are plenty of chances for something to use >SQLite. > >Also, since your question is not clear on whether you mean SQLite is >installed as part of the port or separately, the port does not install >any files that might indicate the presence of an internal copy of SQLite. I've never set ports options at all. I just do generic installs, whenever I'm forced to use ports rather than packages. MariaDB 10.1 was and should still be a standalone installand with no dependencies at all. So to see config-recursive pop up config screens for sqlite, tcl, and other stuff that has no logical connection to MariaDB at all is disconcerting to say the least. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
