-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2017-01-17 15:01, Rainer Hurling wrote: > Am 17.01.2017 um 21:29 schrieb Larry Rosenman: >> With the imminent demise of astro/boinc-setiathome-v7, I'm wondering if >> the >> community would object to net/boinc-client having its LINUX set as a >> default for the package. Or a slave port with that option set. >> >> I'm planning on taking MAINTAINER of net/boinc-client but would like >> input >> on the above. >> >> Thanks! > > Thanks for taking this up. It is really appreciated. > > Excuse my ignorance. But, what are the differences in using native or > Linux boinc clients? And is this only of interest for SetiAtHome? > > Thanks for any answer. > > Best regards, > Rainer Hurling
net/boinc-client would still be a native FreeBSD binary. This would allow SETI@home (and other science projects) to send Linux binaries to our FreeBSD boinc-client. The downside is it would bring in a linux-base port by default. - -- Larry Rosenman http://people.freebsd.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@freebsd.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYfomsAAoJEGl8mbGrSKd9gFsH/Al/AN8Ym46dWln88LaqBenC 8LClG4BpjvSs0ev3fI6uHKFShn+BPmQhuCMzsMakxCBqir2cV/FlV2EvENhLgQ8p 56dHgFRMnXDpSneyScfUcs4RDTIZmUnp/6cku3Us/qh/0mChA9rY73Yiqyh3C9UB q5a068XT6So3nzos/DcyQ3In4y8OYs4H9DmDzHt2yDaRvwITp1nQmycAjgBY3gbS B+UiA23PjjT700fnAjLQNnu/9T7fRUgl7t46th4i1hQbxWW6MlMhCHfgBz/cWzsA 5iKprdcUz7bHB6Ul/2wewsx0cSpRUiprK4mSRD05Rb6OX/0U1a6aJabcTA7y+7o= =IFkG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
