On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote:
> > On 29 Dec, 2016, at 13:24, Timur I. Bakeyev <ti...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> > wrote: > >> > On 28 Dec, 2016, at 7:51, Timur I. Bakeyev <ti...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, CVB! > >> > > >> > At the moment I can't connect to svn.freebsd.org on whatever > reason... BTW, > >> > anyone knows, what has changed in recent 12 hours? > >> > > >> > You can apply the following patch manually: > >> > > >> > With best regards, > >> > BaT > >> > >> Timur, > >> > >> No packages for samba are being built because configure with the > default option set fails. Samba can't depend on openldap-sasl if its > databases/ldb dependency depends on openldap (without sasl). > >> > >> Either samba needs to depend on openldap without sasl, or ldb needs to > depend on openldap-sasl. > >> > >> # Adam > > Hi, Adam! > > > > I've seen the reports and think to upgrade ldb to work with ldap-sasl > version instead. In general, handling of SASL in LDAP package isn't > graceful, while libraries by themselves are interchangeable, pkg sees them > as entirely different ones :( > > Agreed, it's really ugly. Does samba require SASL-enabled OpenLDAP? Keep > in mind that if ldb and samba* require openldap-sasl, then every port that > depends on either of them might require adding WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL too. > Luckily, there aren't many ports that directly depend on samba* or ldb*. I believe most of the time samba is run dependency rather that build dependency. Regards, Timur. P.S> I really wonder, what was the problem with svn.freebsd.org(213.138.116.72) yesterday, so I couldn't connect for half a day. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
