On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote: > Hi, > > is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for > clang via compiler:openmp? With devel/openmp in the ports tree, I'd > expect compiler:openmp to set > > LIB_DEPENDS+= libomp.so:devel/openmp > > for compiler=clang. CFLAGS and LIBS/LDFLAGS might be tweaked on a > per-port level.
I talked with Baptiste about this in Belgrade. I think the best way forward would be to remove the OPENMP option from the llvm ports and alter the clang-patch-fopenmp.diff patch to use the .so from devel/openmp. I have a major deadline at the end of the week so it definitely won't happen this week. -- Brooks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature