Le 04/10/2016 à 03:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : > On 10/03/2016 07:34 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >> <step...@missouri.edu> wrote: >>> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >>>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >>>> <step...@missouri.edu> wrote: >>>>> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have >>>>> licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in >>>>> those ports? >>>> The other answers are correct. If the license is standard (listed >>>> here: https://spdx.org/licenses/) we should add it to the main >>>> database. >>>> >>>>> An even tougher one is math/octave-forge-optim, where each individual >>>>> file has its own license. >>>> A "custom" license that merely states to check the distfiles should be >>>> sufficient. >>> How about a meta port, whose dependencies all have different licenses? >>> Something similar? >> meta-ports shouldn't define a license at all. I'm not sure we have a >> way to shut the warnings up though. > Could we use USES=metaport to suppress these messages?
Suppress what messages ? -- Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
