On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:28:14 +0300 Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> The option which would fix all this mess is:
> 1. add rpath for gcc lib/ directory into spec file
> and
> 2. make ports collection use its own compiler instead of fighting with
> the base.
That still doesn't cover all cases, e.g.:
port exec -> base lib -> libgcc_s.so.1
-> port lib -> recent libgcc_s.so.1
An example is:
% echo 'int main(void){}' > test.c
% clang37 -o test test.c -lexecinfo -lgfortran -L/usr/local/lib/gcc5
-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/gcc5
% ./test
/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by
/usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgfortran.so.3 not found
The base library (libexecinfo) doesn't have DT_RPATH or DT_RUNPATH so the
only way rtld can find the right libgcc_s.so is if the executable (test)
has DT_RPATH and no DT_RUNPATH. Clang runs ld with --enable-new-dtags
so the executable has DT_RUNPATH. DT_RPATH is deprecated in the Linux
world so there are probably more ports that use --enable-new-dtags.
Another example seems to be Rust.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
