On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Kurt Jaeger <li...@opsec.eu> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > I wrote an update for security/w3af and the hole was deeper than I
> thought.
>
> Thanks! That looks very interesting!
>
> > It was necessary several new ports as dependency:
> [...]
> > I did not open a PR yet... I am wondering if is better open a new PR for
> > each dependency or just one PR for security/w3af, anyone could help ?
>
> If you create PRs for each depend and link them to the main PR for
> the security/w2af update, that would be the recommended way.
>
> > There are still a few issues to be resolved and plugins to be tested.
> This
> > happens with me too:
> > https://github.com/andresriancho/w3af/issues/13636
> >
> > The patch is here:
> > http://dbaio.bs2cloud.com.br/FreeBSD/w3af/w3af_1.6.49.patch
>
> If you can add that patch to the port ?



Hi!

Thanks for your answer.

It's done.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211061

Regards.
-- 
Danilo G. Baio (dbaio)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to