On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Kurt Jaeger <li...@opsec.eu> wrote: > Hi! > > > I wrote an update for security/w3af and the hole was deeper than I > thought. > > Thanks! That looks very interesting! > > > It was necessary several new ports as dependency: > [...] > > I did not open a PR yet... I am wondering if is better open a new PR for > > each dependency or just one PR for security/w3af, anyone could help ? > > If you create PRs for each depend and link them to the main PR for > the security/w2af update, that would be the recommended way. > > > There are still a few issues to be resolved and plugins to be tested. > This > > happens with me too: > > https://github.com/andresriancho/w3af/issues/13636 > > > > The patch is here: > > http://dbaio.bs2cloud.com.br/FreeBSD/w3af/w3af_1.6.49.patch > > If you can add that patch to the port ?
Hi! Thanks for your answer. It's done. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211061 Regards. -- Danilo G. Baio (dbaio) _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"