2016-07-08 9:26 GMT+03:00 Mathieu Arnold <m...@freebsd.org>: > Hi, > > During this summer (sometime in August I think) I will be changing the > default OpenSSL for the ports tree from the base system version to > security/openssl. > > I will also, because it goes with it, change the default GSSAPI from base > to something else, I think the consensus was to use the MIT version, which > is security/krb5. > > Before I do that, it would be nice if people who actually use Kerberos (so, > that's the two of you at the back) could provide some feedback if it > changing this will break things. > > -- > Mathieu Arnold
Hi! I'm sorry, if this questions already was answered: Does making base openssl private for base system components mean it will include only headers/libs (in future?)? I mean no binaries or any kind of other resources like examples/docs? I think keeping them in base will be a bit weird in such case. Also if base openssl becomes private do we need Kerberos in base? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
