On 06/23/2016 14:54, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
Could you please elaborate on the reasons why you want to do that? I don't
see how that particular combination of options would introduce a dependence
that neither of them alone would.

In this particular case, as I figured, this isn't actually necessary. But it could be necessary in general, when, say, only in GUI there are some messages to translate, or only GUI needs python.

And then, why not include port.options.mk? Then you could explicitly check
for both options being set.


You are right. But without including port.options.mk Makefile looks so much more elegant. Several times I received e-mails asking to remove port.options.mk inclusion to highten the degree of elegance this way. -)


Yuri

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to