Kubilay Kocak wrote: > The real question that informs the decision is: Might/Do the people > using the quarterly want/need this? [snip] > A really way to get a better feel is to browse the quarterly commit log: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2015Q4/?view=log > > However, if you're unsure, it's appropriate to set the merge-quarterly > flag to ? *any time* you think that (or are not entirely sure whether) a > change/issue may need to be committed to quarterly. Really. > > We'd rather quarterly become high value and deal with a few more issues > that have the flag incorrectly set (and deny the request), than missing > commits/fixes that go into head that should be merged, but aren't.
Thanks a bunch, it looks pretty clear to me. AvW -- I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
