https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199897
Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@freebsd.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People
CC| |ger...@freebsd.org
Assignee|ger...@freebsd.org |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Status|New |Open
--- Comment #1 from Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@freebsd.org> ---
I agree with most of this. (Using one's toolchain C++ run-time library
with binaries built by the other is probably tougher and more fragile
than the benefit.)
This is a clear case where having the ability to easily break one port
into several binary packages (as RPM has been doing for quite a while)
would be great.
Once we have this, certainly worth a try. Before that, and for the
time being, I won't be able to make this a priority.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
